Setup accuracy for prone and supine whole breast irradiation

Strahlenther Onkol. 2016 Apr;192(4):254-9. doi: 10.1007/s00066-016-0943-6. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) based setup accuracy and margins for prone and supine whole breast irradiation (WBI).

Methods: Setup accuracy was evaluated on 3559 CBCT scans of 242 patients treated with WBI and uncertainty margins were calculated using the van Herk formula. Uni- and multivariate analysis on individual margins was performed for age, body mass index (BMI) and cup size.

Results: The population-based margin in vertical (VE), lateral (LA) and longitudinal (LO) directions was 10.4/9.4/9.4 mm for the 103 supine and 10.5/22.4/13.7 mm for the 139 prone treated patients, being significantly (p < 0.01) different for the LA and LO directions. Multivariate analysis identified a significant (p < 0.05) correlation between BMI and the LO margin in supine position and the VE/LA margin in prone position.

Conclusion: In this series, setup accuracy is significantly worse in prone compared to supine position for the LA and LO directions. However, without proper image-guidance, uncertainty margins of about 1 cm are also necessary for supine WBI. For patients with a higher BMI, larger margins are required.

Keywords: Breast radiotherapy; Cone-beam computed tomography; Prone position; Setup accuracy; Supine position.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology
  • Breast Neoplasms / radiotherapy*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Positioning*
  • Prone Position*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Radiotherapy Setup Errors / prevention & control*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Supine Position*