Outcome and risk of recurrence for endoscopic resection of colonic superficial neoplastic lesions over 2 cm in diameter

Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Apr;48(4):399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

Abstract

Background: Large colorectal superficial neoplastic lesions are challenging to remove. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of routine endoscopic resection of large (≥2 cm and <3 cm) and giant (≥3 cm) lesions.

Methods: From 4587 endoscopic resections, 265 (5.7%) large and giant lesions were removed in 249 patients. We retrospectively analyzed 125 patients (141 endoscopic mucosal resection, 73 large and 68 giant lesions) with a follow-up of 6-12 months. Rate of en bloc and piecemeal resection, recurrence and risk factors were analyzed.

Results: En bloc was performed in 92 cases (65.2%) and piecemeal resection in 49 (34.8%). A complete endoscopic resection was achieved in 139 cases (98.5%) with radical resection in 84/139 cases (60.4%). Argon plasma coagulation was applied in 18/141 lesions (12.8%). A recurrence occurred in 16/139 lesions (11.5%). The risk of recurrence at one year was significantly higher for giant than large lesions (p=0.03). The recurrence risk was higher in treated than in non-argon plasma coagulation treated lesions (p=0.01).

Conclusions: endoscopic mucosal resection is a safe and effective routine treatment for large superficial neoplastic lesions. The risk factors for recurrence include giant size, non-protruding morphology, piecemeal technique and argon plasma coagulation.

Keywords: En block; Endoscopic mucosa resection; Piecemeal; Polyps; Superficial neoplastic lesions.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Argon Plasma Coagulation
  • Colonic Polyps / pathology*
  • Colonic Polyps / surgery
  • Colonoscopy
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / surgery
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Intestinal Mucosa / pathology*
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / epidemiology*
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome