We have carried out a prospective study on the impact of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) on the management of patients with carcinoma of the ovary. Seventy-eight CT and 88 US scans were performed on 94 patients. Clinicians decided patient management prospectively at the time the CT and/or US was ordered. Clinical assessment differed from the result obtained by CT or US in 45% of cases (35/78 and 40/88, respectively). CT and US altered patient management in only a minority of cases (14/78, 18% and 9/88, 10% respectively). Even when the scan and clinical assessments differed, management was only altered on 14/35 (40%) occasions after CT and on 9/40 (23%) occasions after US, a difference which was not significant. In patients with clinically undetectable disease, management was altered by CT on 17% of occasions and by US on 10%. We conclude that in patients with carcinoma of the ovary CT and US alters patient management in a minority of cases. In view of current financial restrictions in health care, clinicians should be more selective in the use of these imaging techniques. Furthermore, we recommend that similar prospective studies are performed for other clinical situations.