Transperineal use of a pocket-sized ultrasound machine vs conventional transvaginal ultrasound: a blinded comparison of cervical length in pregnancy

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;48(4):535-536. doi: 10.1002/uog.15861. Epub 2016 Aug 18.

Authors

D Wye¹, J Woo², B Mein², R Magotti^{2

3}, A Martin⁴, R Benzie^{2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Christopher Kohlenberg Department of Perinatal Ultrasound, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia. deborah.wye@health.nsw.gov.au.
² Christopher Kohlenberg Department of Perinatal Ultrasound, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
³ University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
⁴ University of Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

PMID: 26776078
DOI: 10.1002/uog.15861

No abstract available

Publication types

Comparative Study
Letter

MeSH terms

Cervical Length Measurement
Cervix Uteri / anatomy & histology
Cervix Uteri / diagnostic imaging*
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Pregnancy
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ultrasonography, Prenatal / instrumentation*
Ultrasonography, Prenatal / methods