Comparative effectiveness of torsemide versus furosemide in heart failure patients: insights from the PROTECT trial

Future Cardiol. 2015 Sep;11(5):585-95. doi: 10.2217/fca.15.56. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

Abstract

Aim: The authors assessed the comparative effectiveness of torsemide versus furosemide in the PROTECT trial.

Methods: The authors assessed the relationship between loop diuretic at discharge and death or cardiovascular/renal hospitalization within 30 days, and death through 150 days postdischarge using inverse probability weighting.

Results: Out of 1004 patients, 83.5% received furosemide and 16.5% torsemide. Torsemide patients had higher blood urea nitrogen, and more in-hospital worsening heart failure. Following adjustment, torsemide was associated with similar 30-day outcomes compared with furosemide (p = 0.93), but remained associated with increased 150-day death (hazard ratio: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.40-3.66; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Patients treated with torsemide had features of greater disease severity, similar 30-day outcomes but increased 150-day mortality. Prospective randomized trials are needed to investigate the effect of torsemide versus furosemide.

Keywords: furosemide; heart failure; loop diuretics; outcomes; torsemide.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Disease Progression
  • Diuretics / administration & dosage
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Europe / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Furosemide / administration & dosage*
  • Heart Failure / drug therapy*
  • Heart Failure / mortality
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Sulfonamides / administration & dosage*
  • Survival Rate / trends
  • Time Factors
  • Torsemide
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Diuretics
  • Sulfonamides
  • Furosemide
  • Torsemide