Comparing the endo-aortic balloon and the external aortic clamp in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Sep;21(3):359-65. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv160. Epub 2015 Jun 20.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the differences in perioperative outcomes and complications between the endo-aortic balloon (EAB) and the external aortic clamp (EAC) during primary elective minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in a single referral centre by one surgeon. Primary outcomes were cardiopulmonary bypass time (CPB), cross-clamp time (CX) and occurrence of postoperative cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs). Secondary outcomes were other perioperative parameters and complications.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed 340 consecutive patients who underwent MIMVS for mitral regurgitation (MR), mitral stenosis or combined regurgitation/stenosis between November 2010 and March 2014 in a single referral centre. In total, 221 patients who underwent an isolated mitral valve repair or isolated mitral valve replacement or repair/replacement combined with an atrial fibrillation (AF)-ablation procedure were included. Patients who had previous cardiac surgery or concomitant tricuspid valve surgery, myxoma or atrial septal defect closure surgery were excluded.

Results: A total of 57 patients (Group A) underwent MIMVS using the EAC and 164 patients (Group B) were operated using an EAB. Preoperative variables showed a significant difference in poor left ventricular function (LVF, P = 0.18) and moderate LVF (P = 0.019). No significant differences were found in CPB-time, cross-clamp time or postoperative CVA. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in complications, 30-day mortality or postoperative echocardiographical MR gradation. Hospital stay, however, was prolonged in Group A (P = 0.001) and maximum troponin T levels were significantly lower in Group B (P = 0.014). In Group B however, 10 procedures were converted (6%) from EAB to EAC.

Conclusions: There is no difference in use between the EAB and the EAC in terms of CPB-time and cross-clamp time, complications or MR gradation at discharge. Use of the EAC showed significantly higher postoperative levels of troponin T, implying more myocardial damage, compared with the EAB. In 6% of the cases however, patients were converted from the EAB to the EAC.

Keywords: Endo-aortic balloon; External aortic clamp; Minimally invasive surgery; Mitral valve.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aorta, Thoracic / surgery*
  • Elective Surgical Procedures / instrumentation
  • Equipment Design
  • Female
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / instrumentation*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / instrumentation*
  • Mitral Valve / surgery*
  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency / surgery*
  • Mitral Valve Stenosis / surgery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surgical Instruments*