Sentencing Male Sex Offenders Under the Age of 14: A Law Reform Advocacy Journey in Hong Kong

J Child Sex Abus. 2015;24(4):333-53. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2015.1022292.

Abstract

The common law presumption that a boy under the age of 14 is incapable of sexual intercourse has provoked controversial debates in Hong Kong. This article describes a 6-step advocacy journey to examine how community efforts have helped modify this law so that juvenile male sexual offenders under the age of 14 who have committed the crime of having sexual intercourse with underage females can be sentenced to receive appropriate treatment. Seven court cases provided by the magistrates' courts in Hong Kong were used in this advocacy effort for the removal of the presumption in July 2012. Although this effort has yet to reveal signs of effectiveness, it represents greater public awareness about providing rehabilitation appropriate for juvenile sex offenders through a formal sentence. Restorative justice, as opposed to retributive or punitive justice, places an emphasis on rehabilitation of the offender and restoration of victims to a place of wholeness.

Keywords: Hong Kong law reform; advocacy; child sexual abuse; common law presumption; juvenile sex offenders under 14 years old; restorative justice.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Child Abuse, Sexual / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Child Abuse, Sexual / statistics & numerical data
  • Criminals / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Criminals / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Hong Kong
  • Humans
  • Juvenile Delinquency / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Juvenile Delinquency / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Sex Offenses / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Sex Offenses / trends
  • Social Justice