The incidence of erectile dysfunction after pelvic fracture urethral injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Arab J Urol. 2015 Mar;13(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

Abstract

Background: Pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) is associated with a high risk of erectile dysfunction (ED). The effect of the type of posterior urethral disruption repair on erectile function has not been clearly established. We systematically reviewed and conducted a meta-analysis of the proportion of patients with ED at (i) baseline after pelvic fracture with PFUI, (ii) after immediate primary realignment, and (iii) after delayed urethroplasty.

Methods: Using search terms for primary realignment or urethroplasty and urethral disruption, we systematically reviewed PubMed and EMBASE. A meta-analysis of the proportion of patients with ED was conducted assuming a random-effects model.

Results: Of 734 articles found, 24 met the inclusion criteria. The estimate of the proportion (95% confidence interval) of patients with ED after (i) PFUI was 34 (25-45)%, after (ii) immediate primary realignment was 16 (8-26)%, and after (iii) delayed urethroplasty was an additional 3 (2-5)% more than the 34% after pelvic fracture in this cohort.

Conclusions: After pelvic fracture, 34% of patients had ED. After primary endoscopic alignment, patients had a lower reported rate of ED (16%). Delayed urethroplasty conferred an additional 3% risk above the 34% associated with PFUI alone, with 37% of patients having de novo ED. The difference in de novo ED after primary endoscopic alignment vs. delayed urethroplasty is probably due to reporting differences in ED and/or patients with less severe injury undergoing primary realignment.

Keywords: ED, erectile dysfunction; Erectile dysfunction; IIEF, International Index of Erectile Function; Meta-analysis; PFUI, pelvic fracture urethral injury; Pelvic fracture; Systematic review; Urethral disruption.

Publication types

  • Review