Early experience with automatic pressure-controlled cerebrospinal fluid drainage during thoracic endovascular aortic repair

J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Jun;22(3):368-72. doi: 10.1177/1526602815579904. Epub 2015 Apr 10.

Abstract

Purpose: To report initial experience with automatic pressure-controlled cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

Methods: A prospective nonrandomized study enrolled 30 consecutive patients (median age 68 years, range 42-89; 18 men) who underwent TEVAR between March 2012 and July 2013 and were considered to be at high risk for postoperative spinal cord ischemia (SCI), fulfilling 2 of the following criteria: stent-graft length >20 cm, left subclavian artery coverage, and previous infrarenal aortic repair. All patients received perioperative CSFD via the LiquoGuard system. The protocol aimed for a CSF pressure of 10 mm Hg and duration of CSFD of 3 or 7 days in asymptomatic or symptomatic patients, respectively. Muscle strength of the lower extremities was assessed with the Oxford muscle strength grading scale.

Results: Completion of the CSFD protocol was achieved in 26 (87%) of 30 patients. CSFD was prematurely stopped due to catheter dislocation in 1 patient and bloody spinal fluid in 3 patients. CSFD was performed for a median of 3 days (range 1-7). Median total CSFD volume was 714 mL (range 13-2369), with a median 192 mL drained per 24 hours. The SCI rate was 3% (1/30). CSFD-related complications were observed in 33% of the patients: 1 fatal intracranial hemorrhage, 3 bloody spinal fluid episodes, 3 persistent CSF leaks requiring epidural blood patch, and 3 post lumbar puncture headaches. Mortality during a median follow-up of 16 months (range 10-25) was 3% (1/30).

Conclusion: Prophylactic CSFD was associated with a low SCI rate in a high-risk patient collective undergoing TEVAR. Monitoring and drainage by an automatic modus was feasible, reproducible, and reliable but associated with relevant drainage-associated complications.

Keywords: automatic fluid drainage; cerebrospinal fluid drainage; cerebrospinal fluid pressure; complications; pressure-controlled fluid drainage; thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aorta, Thoracic / surgery*
  • Automation
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation* / adverse effects
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation* / instrumentation
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation* / mortality
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure*
  • Drainage / adverse effects
  • Drainage / instrumentation
  • Drainage / methods*
  • Drainage / mortality
  • Endovascular Procedures* / adverse effects
  • Endovascular Procedures* / instrumentation
  • Endovascular Procedures* / mortality
  • Equipment Design
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Monitoring, Intraoperative
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Risk Factors
  • Spinal Cord Ischemia / diagnosis
  • Spinal Cord Ischemia / etiology
  • Spinal Cord Ischemia / mortality
  • Spinal Cord Ischemia / prevention & control*
  • Spinal Puncture
  • Stents
  • Time Factors
  • Transducers, Pressure
  • Treatment Outcome