Conclusion: GelitaSpon gelatin sponge (GS) showed faster reabsorption than gelfoam (GF) in vitro, and GS-packed middle ears resulted in a faster hearing recovery and less inflammation than the ears packed with GF soaked in saline. Soaking GF sponges with boric acid (BA) appeared to offset the inflammatory response of saline-soaked GF, making this inflammatory response comparable to that of GS-packed ears.
Objective: To describe the reabsorption and inflammatory effects of absorbable gelatin sponge in the middle ear.
Methods: For in vitro evaluation, GF and GS were used as disks immersed in saline solution or 3% BA and placed in gel. Images were captured with a microscope and processed using image processing Toolbox. For in vivo tests, 16 female albino Sprague Dawley rats were divided into four groups: bulla opening; GF + 0.9% saline; GF + BA; and GS + 0.9% saline. An anterior approach to the right bulla was used for surgery. Preoperative and postoperative auditory brainstem response thresholds were measured.
Results: In vitro, there was marked degradation of GF by day 14, while GS showed complete degradation by the third day. In vivo, hearing recovery occurred by day 21. GF produced a more severe inflammatory response, which could be reduced by treating the GF with BA.
Keywords: Absorbable gelatine; boric acid; inflammation; middle ear surgery.