Radiographic comparison of mobile-bearing partial knee single-peg versus twin-peg design

J Arthroplasty. 2015 Mar;30(3):475-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.015. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

Abstract

The femoral component and proprietary instrumentation of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) was redesigned with an additional peg for enhanced fixation, 15° of extra femoral surface for contact in deep flexion, more rounded profile, better fit into the milled surface, and redesigned intramedullary based instrumentation. To assess the benefit of these changes, we compared postoperative radiographs of 219 single-peg and 186 twin-peg UKAs done in 2008-2011. All surviving knees demonstrated satisfactory position and alignment with no radiolucencies observed. Radiographic analysis showed improved and consistent component positioning with the twin-peg design implanted with updated instrumentation compared with the single-peg. The radiographic benefits of improved implant positioning using the twin-peg component and updated instrumentation are clear and carry tremendous potential. More robust follow-up is imperative.

Keywords: component design; instrumentation; partial knee arthroplasty; radiographic analysis; surgical technique; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / instrumentation*
  • Female
  • Femur / diagnostic imaging*
  • Femur / surgery
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint / diagnostic imaging*
  • Knee Joint / surgery
  • Knee Prosthesis*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Radiography
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Registries