Total breast reconstruction using autologous fat grafting following nipple-sparing mastectomy in irradiated and non-irradiated patients

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Dec;38(6):1101-8. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0406-3. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

Abstract

Background: Although autologous microvascular reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is considered one of the best reconstructive choices, this procedure cannot be offered to all patients. The aim of this study was to define a fat grafting protocol for successful reconstruction following NSM and to assess its reliability in irradiated and non-irradiated patients.

Materials and methods: Twenty-one patients were prospectively enrolled and stratified in Group-A (11 non-irradiated) and Group-B (10 irradiated) NSMs comparing clinical and aesthetic outcomes. A fat grafting protocol was used to standardize the procedure. Continuous and categorical variables were analysed using the Student t test and the Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively. A value of p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The groups were homogeneous in terms of demographics (p > 0.05), while number of sessions, mean volume of the first two treatments, and overall injected volume showed significant differences (p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p = 0.002). Volume, shape, position of the breast mound, IMF and scar location subscales obtained high score evaluations without a significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05), whereas the skin texture subscale showed a lower score evaluation in Group-B than in Group-A (p = 0.001). Although a significant difference for total subscales was in favour of Group-A (p = 0.001), the global score had a high rate evaluation in both groups (p = 0.132). Inter-rater reliability showed substantial agreement among all categories, total and global scores.

Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective series of fat transfer reconstructions following NSM using a systematic approach. Although further studies are required, it may be considered an effective option whenever flap reconstruction cannot be performed.

Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adipose Tissue / transplantation*
  • Breast Neoplasms / radiotherapy
  • Breast Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Mammaplasty / methods
  • Mastectomy, Subcutaneous / methods*
  • Nipples / pathology
  • Nipples / surgery*
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / methods*
  • Surgical Flaps*
  • Transplantation, Autologous
  • Treatment Outcome