Comparison of the prognostic utility of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System and the French Prognostic Scoring System in azacitidine-treated patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Br J Haematol. 2014 Aug;166(3):352-9. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12884. Epub 2014 Apr 9.

Abstract

The revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) was developed in a cohort of untreated myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients. A French Prognostic Scoring System (FPSS) was recently reported to identify differential survival among azacitidine-treated patients with high-risk MDS. We applied the FPSS and IPSS-R to 150 patients previously randomized to azacitidine monotherapy or a combination of azacitidine with entinostat (a histone deacetylase inhibitor). Neither score predicted response but both discriminated patients with different overall survival (OS; median OS, FPSS: 9·7, 14·7, and 25·3 months, P = 0·018; IPSS-R: 12·5, 11·3, 20·8, and 36 months, P = 0·005). Statistical analysis suggested no improvement in OS prediction for the FPSS over the IPSS-R in azacitidine-treated patients.

Keywords: French Prognostic Scoring System; azacitidine; myelodysplastic syndromes; prognostic models; revised International Prognostic Scoring System.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic / administration & dosage
  • Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic / therapeutic use*
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
  • Azacitidine / administration & dosage
  • Azacitidine / therapeutic use*
  • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors / administration & dosage
  • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes / drug therapy*
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes / mortality*
  • Prognosis
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
  • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
  • Azacitidine