Background: The development of component-resolved diagnostics constitutes a potential breakthrough in food allergy testing, as detection of specific IgE (sIgE) to individual allergens may make it possible to establish the risk of a mild versus severe reaction.
Objective: To compare allergists' risk assessment based on the current decision making process with that of virtual allergen-oriented risk assessment through microarray-based immunoassay.
Methods: An observational, real-life study was performed on 86 adults with food allergy. The prescription of epinephrine was the surrogate marker of a severe reaction. In the same patients, the prescription of epinephrine based on the current decision making of the allergist and the independently established allergen-oriented risk assessment determined by microarray-based immunoassay were compared.
Results: Fair degree of agreement between the specialists' risk assessment and that of the microarray-based immunoassay (k index 0.372 (95% CI: 0.185- 0.559) p < 0.001) was documented. Three causes of discrepancy emerged: the poor sensitivity of the allergen microarray-immunoassay (51.9%), the differences in risk assessment established by the specialist and the microarray-immunoassay (33.3%), the non-inclusion of the causative allergen in the microarray-immunoassay platform (14.8%).
Conclusion: Improvement of the diagnostic accuracy of microarray-immunoassay, combined with marrying its results to clinical information, could one day soon lead to changes in clinical practice in food allergy.
Keywords: Food allergy; component-resolved diagnostics; food allergenic molecules; risk-assessment.