The neural circuitry of reward processing in complex social comparison: evidence from an event-related FMRI study

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 10;8(12):e82534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082534. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

In this study, Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was conducted to investigate the mechanisms by which the brain activity in a complex social comparison context. One true subject and two pseudo-subjects were asked to complete a simple number estimate task at the same time which including upward and downward comparisons. Two categories of social comparison rewards (fair and unfair rewards distributions) were mainly presented by comparing the true subject with other two pseudo-subjects. Particularly, there were five conditions of unfair distribution when all the three subjects were correct but received different rewards. Behavioral data indicated that the ability to self-regulate was important in satisfaction judgment when the subject perceived an unfair reward distribution. fMRI data indicated that the interaction between the ventral striatum and the prefrontal cortex was important in self-regulation under specific conditions in complex social comparison, especially under condition of reward processing when there were two different reward values and the subject failed to exhibit upward comparison.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Basal Ganglia* / diagnostic imaging
  • Basal Ganglia* / physiology
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
  • Male
  • Personal Satisfaction*
  • Prefrontal Cortex* / diagnostic imaging
  • Prefrontal Cortex* / physiology
  • Radiography
  • Reward*
  • Social Control, Informal

Grants and funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31070900; 31271087), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (2011) by the Ministry of Education, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU1209101) and the Key Discipline Fund of National 211 Project (TR201208-1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.