How to use multi-criteria decision analysis methods for reimbursement decision-making in healthcare: a step-by-step guide

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Feb;14(1):81-99. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.859525. Epub 2013 Dec 13.

Abstract

In recent years, the quest for more comprehensiveness, structure and transparency in reimbursement decision-making in healthcare has prompted the research into alternative decision-making frameworks. In this environment, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is arising as a valuable tool to support healthcare decision-making. In this paper, we present the main MCDA decision support methods (elementary methods, value-based measurement models, goal programming models and outranking models) using a case study approach. For each family of methods, an example of how an MCDA model would operate in a real decision-making context is presented from a critical perspective, highlighting the parameters setting, the selection of the appropriate evaluation model as well as the role of sensitivity and robustness analyses. This study aims to provide a step-by-step guide on how to use MCDA methods for reimbursement decision-making in healthcare.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Decision Making*
  • Decision Support Techniques*
  • Delivery of Health Care / economics
  • Delivery of Health Care / organization & administration
  • Humans
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Reimbursement Mechanisms / economics*