Appropriate gastrectomy resection margins for early gastric carcinoma

J Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;109(3):198-201. doi: 10.1002/jso.23483. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

Abstract

Objective: In Korea and Japan, early gastric cancer (EGC) accounts for >50% of all gastric cancers. Here, we propose recommendations for the optimal distance from the tumor to the resection margins when evaluating EGC.

Summary of background data: There are very few guidelines regarding the distance from the EGC tumor to the resection margins.

Methods: We evaluated 2,081 patients who underwent gastrectomy for EGC between January 1989 and May 2000. We subdivided tumors according to the distance from the proximal margin: ≤ 1, >1, ≤ 10, >10, ≤ 30, or >30 mm.

Results: Three of five patients demonstrating distances ≤ 1 mm between the tumor and gross proximal margin were microscopically positive. No patients with gross proximal margins >1, ≤ 10, >10, or ≤ 30 mm were microscopically positive. There were no statistical differences in rates of microscopically positive margin, reresection, or reoperation between groups (P > 0.05). In addition, there were statistical differences in terms of tumor recurrence and disease-related death between groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: When the resection margins are clear, we propose that margins >1 mm are adequate for EGC gastrectomy.

Keywords: early gastric cancer; reresection; resection margin.

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma / mortality
  • Adenocarcinoma / pathology*
  • Adenocarcinoma / surgery*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Gastrectomy / methods*
  • Gastric Mucosa / pathology
  • Gastric Mucosa / surgery
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Male
  • Microscopy
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / epidemiology*
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / etiology
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Republic of Korea / epidemiology
  • Stomach Neoplasms / mortality
  • Stomach Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Stomach Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Treatment Outcome