Clinical outcomes with bioabsorbable polymer- versus durable polymer-based drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 4;63(4):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.061. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the relative safety and efficacy of bioabsorbable polymer (BP)-based biolimus-eluting stents (BES) versus durable-polymer (DP)-drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) by means of a network meta-analysis.

Background: Studies have suggested that BP-BES might reduce the risk of stent thrombosis (ST) and late adverse outcomes compared with first-generation DES. However, the relative safety and efficacy of BP-BES versus newer-generation DES coated with more biocompatible DP have not been investigated in depth.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials comparing BP-BES versus currently U.S.-approved DES or BMS were searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Information on study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample characteristics, and clinical outcomes was extracted.

Results: Data from 89 trials including 85,490 patients were analyzed. At 1-year follow-up, BP-BES were associated with lower rates of cardiac death/myocardial infarction (MI), MI, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) than BMS and lower rates of TVR than fast-release zotarolimus-eluting stents. The BP-BES had similar rates of cardiac death/MI, MI, and TVR compared with other second-generation DP-DES but higher rates of 1-year ST than cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES). The BP-BES were associated with improved late outcomes compared with BMS and paclitaxel-eluting stents, considering the latest follow-up data available, with nonsignificantly different outcomes compared with other DP-DES although higher rates of definite ST compared with CoCr-EES.

Conclusions: In this large-scale network meta-analysis, BP-BES were associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with BMS and first-generation DES and similar rates of cardiac death/MI, MI, and TVR compared with second-generation DP-DES but higher rates of definite ST than CoCr-EES.

Keywords: BES; BP; CI; CoCr-EES; DP; OR; PC-ZES; PES; PtCr-EES; RCT; SES; ST; TVR; bare-metal stent(s); bioabsorbable polymers; biolimus-eluting stent(s); cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent(s); credible interval; drug-eluting stent(s); durable polymers; meta-analysis; odds ratio; paclitaxel-eluting stent(s); phosphorylcholine-based zotarolimus-eluting stent(s); platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stent(s); randomized controlled trial; sirolimus-eluting stent(s); stent thrombosis; target vessel revascularizations.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cardiovascular Agents / administration & dosage
  • Chromium Alloys
  • Coated Materials, Biocompatible*
  • Coronary Thrombosis / epidemiology*
  • Coronary Thrombosis / prevention & control
  • Drug-Eluting Stents*
  • Everolimus
  • Humans
  • Myocardial Infarction / epidemiology*
  • Myocardial Infarction / therapy
  • Myocardial Revascularization / statistics & numerical data*
  • Paclitaxel / administration & dosage
  • Polymers
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Sirolimus / administration & dosage
  • Sirolimus / analogs & derivatives
  • Stents*

Substances

  • Cardiovascular Agents
  • Chromium Alloys
  • Coated Materials, Biocompatible
  • Polymers
  • Everolimus
  • zotarolimus
  • Paclitaxel
  • Sirolimus