Identification of chemical hazards for terrestrial plants in the regulatory context: comparison of OECD and ISO guidelines

Chemosphere. 2013 Nov;93(10):2578-84. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.078.

Abstract

Standardized test protocols are used in the regulatory context for identifying the hazardous properties of chemicals, wastes, and contaminated materials. This paper compares the relevance of two guidelines measuring effects on terrestrial plants, the OECD TG 208 and the ISO TG 22030 and presents the scientific basis for a recent decision of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) under the European chemicals regulation REACH. If there are no specific phytotoxicity alerts, both guidelines are considered suitable for assessing long-term hazards, providing that a sufficient number of species is included in the OECD protocol, the recommended minimum number is six, which offer a reasonably broad selection of species to account for interspecies sensitivity. The proposed methodology, based on a combination of probabilistic assessments using Monte Carlo analysis, can be adapted for supporting similar decisions under specific regulatory processes; for example, for assessing contaminated soils or pesticides' applications.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Environmental Policy
  • Environmental Pollution / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Hazardous Substances / standards
  • Hazardous Substances / toxicity*
  • Plants / drug effects*
  • Soil Pollutants / standards
  • Soil Pollutants / toxicity*

Substances

  • Hazardous Substances
  • Soil Pollutants