The motor system contributes to comprehension of abstract language

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 26;8(9):e75183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075183. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

If language comprehension requires a sensorimotor simulation, how can abstract language be comprehended? We show that preparation to respond in an upward or downward direction affects comprehension of the abstract quantifiers "more and more" and "less and less" as indexed by an N400-like component. Conversely, the semantic content of the sentence affects the motor potential measured immediately before the upward or downward action is initiated. We propose that this bidirectional link between motor system and language arises because the motor system implements forward models that predict the sensory consequences of actions. Because the same movement (e.g., raising the arm) can have multiple forward models for different contexts, the models can make different predictions depending on whether the arm is raised, for example, to place an object or raised as a threat. Thus, different linguistic contexts invoke different forward models, and the predictions constitute different understandings of the language.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • China
  • Comprehension / physiology*
  • Efferent Pathways / physiology*
  • Electroencephalography
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Language*
  • Male
  • Models, Psychological*
  • Psychomotor Performance / physiology*
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This research was supported by National Social Science Foundation Grant (13BYY070), National Office for Education Sciences Planning Grant (DBA120179), Engineering Research Institute Foundations of USTB Grant (YJ2012-019) to Connie Qun Guan. Arthur Glenberg was partially supported by U.S. National Science Foundation grants 1020367 and 1324807. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. National Science Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.