Background: Lower extremity length inequality can be problematic in children and is often addressed surgically. Several techniques have traditionally been utilized for epiphysiodesis, the goal being physeal ablation. Recently, 8-plates, initially developed for hemiepiphysiodesis, have been extended to epiphysiodesis by placing the plates on both medial and lateral sides of the physis. No prior studies have compared 8-plates with physeal ablation techniques.
Methods: Between January 2003 and August 2009, 27 patients underwent epiphysiodesis surgery using either physeal ablation or 8-plate technique. Sixteen patients had physeal ablation and 11 had dual 8-plates. A retrospective chart review sought demographic data, outcomes, and complications. Radiographs were reviewed to measure pretreatment and posttreatment limb lengths.
Results: The median improvement in limb length discrepancy was 15.5 mm in the physeal ablation group and 4 mm in the 8-plate group (P<0.001). This difference was maintained following linear regression factoring out the effect of time (10.78 mm for ablation vs. 5.62 mm for 8-plates; P=0.016). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rate between the groups (P=0.112).
Conclusions: Our study demonstrated physeal ablation to be a significantly superior treatment compared with dual 8-plates for epiphysiodesis. Despite theoretical advantages of 8-plates to perform epiphysiodesis about the knee, this study does not recommend the use of medial and lateral 8-plates to effect epiphysiodesis.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic III.