A centralized research data repository enhances retrospective outcomes research capacity: a case report

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 May 1;20(3):563-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001302. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

Abstract

This paper describes our considerations and methods for implementing an open-source centralized research data repository (CRDR) and reports its impact on retrospective outcomes research capacity in the urology department at Columbia University. We performed retrospective pretest and post-test analyses of user acceptance, workflow efficiency, and publication quantity and quality (measured by journal impact factor) before and after the implementation. The CRDR transformed the research workflow and enabled a new research model. During the pre- and post-test periods, the department's average annual retrospective study publication rate was 11.5 and 25.6, respectively; the average publication impact score was 1.7 and 3.1, respectively. The new model was adopted by 62.5% (5/8) of the clinical scientists within the department. Additionally, four basic science researchers outside the department took advantage of the implemented model. The average proximate time required to complete a retrospective study decreased from 12 months before the implementation to <6 months after the implementation. Implementing a CRDR appears to be effective in enhancing the outcomes research capacity for one academic department.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biomedical Research* / organization & administration
  • Databases as Topic*
  • Humans
  • Journal Impact Factor
  • New York City
  • Organizational Case Studies
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Publishing / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies*
  • Schools, Medical
  • Urology*
  • Workflow