Methods to quantify soft-tissue based facial growth and treatment outcomes in children: a systematic review

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041898. Epub 2012 Aug 6.

Abstract

Context: Technological advancements have led craniofacial researchers and clinicians into the era of three-dimensional digital imaging for quantitative evaluation of craniofacial growth and treatment outcomes.

Objective: To give an overview of soft-tissue based methods for quantitative longitudinal assessment of facial dimensions in children until six years of age and to assess the reliability of these methods in studies with good methodological quality.

Data source: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus and CINAHL were searched. A hand search was performed to check for additional relevant studies.

Study selection: Primary publications on facial growth and treatment outcomes in children younger than six years of age were included.

Data extraction: Independent data extraction by two observers. A quality assessment instrument was used to determine the methodological quality. Methods, used in studies with good methodological quality, were assessed for reliability expressed as the magnitude of the measurement error and the correlation coefficient between repeated measurements.

Results: In total, 47 studies were included describing 4 methods: 2D x-ray cephalometry; 2D photography; anthropometry; 3D imaging techniques (surface laser scanning, stereophotogrammetry and cone beam computed tomography). In general the measurement error was below 1 mm and 1° and correlation coefficients range from 0.65 to 1.0.

Conclusion: Various methods have shown to be reliable. However, at present stereophotogrammetry seems to be the best 3D method for quantitative longitudinal assessment of facial dimensions in children until six years of age due to its millisecond fast image capture, archival capabilities, high resolution and no exposure to ionizing radiation.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Cephalometry / methods*
  • Child
  • Face / anatomy & histology
  • Humans
  • Maxillofacial Development / physiology*
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Treatment Outcome

Grants and funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Dutch Technology Foundation to STW (grant no. 10315). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.