Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting

Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Aug;55(8):854-63. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825b9052.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer has remained controversial because of the lack of level 1 evidence regarding oncologic safety and long-term survival.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal cancer on clinical and oncologic outcome in the multimodal setting.

Design: This is a review of prospectively gathered data from a single-institution rectal cancer database.

Settings: This study was conducted in the Central Hospital of Central Finland.

Patients: From January 1999 to December 2006, 191 selected patients were included.

Interventions: One hundred patients underwent laparoscopic resection, and 91 patients, also suitable for laparoscopic surgery, underwent open major rectal resection in the multimodal setting.

Main outcome measures: The main measures of outcome were early recovery and short- and long-term morbidity; local recurrence and survival were secondary outcomes.

Limitations: This is not a randomized study.

Results: The study groups were balanced for baseline characteristics. Conversion rate to open surgery was 22%. Laparoscopic surgery resulted in significantly less bleeding (175 mL vs 500 mL, p < 0.001), 1 day earlier recovery of normal diet (3 days vs 4 days, p = 0.001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (7 days vs 9 days, p < 0.001). Postoperative 30-day mortality (1% vs 3%), morbidity (31% vs 43%), readmission (11% vs 15%), and reoperation (6% vs 9%) rates were similar in the 2 groups, but significantly fewer patients in the laparoscopic group had long-term complications (19% vs 36%, p = 0.033). The 5-year disease-free survival (78% vs 80%, p = 0.74) and local recurrence (5% vs 6%, p = 0.66) rates were similar in the laparoscopic and open group for those 175 patients treated for cure.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery resulted in faster postoperative recovery and fewer long-term complications than open surgery without apparently compromising the long-term oncologic outcome. Our results indicate that laparoscopic rectal resection is an acceptable alternative to open surgery in selected patients with rectal cancer.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Length of Stay / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Patient Readmission / statistics & numerical data
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Recovery of Function
  • Rectal Neoplasms / mortality
  • Rectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Rectal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Rectal Neoplasms / therapy
  • Rectum / surgery*
  • Reoperation / statistics & numerical data
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome