Comparison of journals of suicidology: a bibliometric study from 2006–2010

Crisis. 2012;33(5):301-5. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000146.

Abstract

Background: Three English-language journals deal explicitly with suicide phenomena. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has analyzed the subject content of these three journals.

Aims: To review the abstracts of the three suicide-related journals in order to clarify the subjects of the papers.

Methods: We examined all abstracts of every paper published in Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, Archives of Suicide Research, and Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior for the 5 years between 2006 and 2010, and categorized each paper by subject.

Results: We found that the journals were similar with respect to subject allocation. Most papers dealt with epidemiological issues (32.7-40.1% of abstracts); prevention (5.8%-15.3%) and research (8.3%-10.6%) were next best represented subjects. Clinical papers comprised from 2.8% to 8.2% of the studies published.

Conclusions: English-language suicide journals publish a preponderance of epidemiological studies. Clinical studies are relatively underrepresented.

MeSH terms

  • Bibliometrics*
  • Epidemiologic Studies
  • Humans
  • Publishing / statistics & numerical data*
  • Suicide Prevention*
  • Suicide* / statistics & numerical data