Functional outcomes for 2 years comparing hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty

J Arthroplasty. 2012 May;27(5):750-7.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.004. Epub 2012 Jan 28.

Abstract

This prospective observational study of 499 patients with hip resurfacing and 255 patients with total hip arthroplasty compared outcomes for 2 years. We used propensity scores to identify matched cohorts of 118 patients with hip resurfacing and 118 patients with total hip arthroplasty. We used these cohorts to compare improvements in the Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index and Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36 physical function component (SF-36 PF) scores at 3 months and at 1 and 2 years postsurgery. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements from baseline in WOMAC and SF-36 PF. Improvements in SF-36 PF were greater for patients with hip resurfacing than for patients with total hip arthroplasty 1 and 2 years postsurgery; improvements in WOMAC were similar for both groups. The clinical significance of this observation needs further investigation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / statistics & numerical data*
  • Body Mass Index
  • Cohort Studies
  • Comorbidity
  • Employment
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hip Joint / physiopathology*
  • Hip Joint / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoarthritis, Hip / epidemiology
  • Osteoarthritis, Hip / surgery*
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Recovery of Function
  • Regression Analysis
  • Reoperation
  • Smoking / epidemiology
  • Treatment Outcome