Essure® hydrosalpinx occlusion prior to IVF-ET as an alternative to laparoscopic salpingectomy

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Mar;161(1):42-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.12.001. Epub 2011 Dec 24.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the success rate of proximal tubal occlusion with Essure(®) devices in subfertile women with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx and to observe the results of subsequent treatment with IVF-ET and/or frozen embryo transfer.

Study design: Prospective, single-arm, clinical study in 20 women with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinges (all visible on transvaginal ultrasound) due to undergo IVF-ET and/or frozen embryo transfer. In all patients, laparoscopy was considered to be contraindicated due to extensive pelvic adhesions.

Result(s): In all patients the Essure(®) devices were placed in an ambulant setting without any complications. Proximal tubal occlusion was confirmed by hysterosalpingography in 19 out of 20 patients (95%) and in 26 of 27 treated tubes (96%). After 45 embryo transfer procedures in 19 patients, 18 pregnancies with 12 live births, 6 miscarriages and 1 immature delivery (probably related to cervical insufficiency leading to chorioamnionitis and subsequent rupture of the membranes) were observed.

Conclusion(s): Essure(®) devices are effective in inducing proximal tubal occlusion in subfertile patients with hydrosalpinges. After artificial reproductive treatments a cumulative live birth rate per patient of 63% and a cumulative live birth rate per transfer of 27% were achieved. The latter was related to the large proportion of patients with severe endometriosis.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Contraindications
  • Embryo Transfer
  • Female
  • Fertilization in Vitro / methods
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy
  • Pregnancy
  • Salpingectomy
  • Sterilization, Tubal / instrumentation
  • Sterilization, Tubal / methods*