Effect of intra-abdominal absorbable sutures on surgical site infection

Surg Today. 2012 Jan;42(1):52-9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-011-0024-5. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

Abstract

Purpose: To establish whether the rates of surgical site infection (SSI) in gastrointestinal surgery are affected by the type of intra-abdominal suturing: sutureless, absorbable material (polyglactin: Vicryl), and silk.

Methods: We conducted SSI surveillance prospectively at 25 hospitals.

Results: The overall SSI rate was 14.4% (130/903). The SSI rates in the sutureless, Vicryl, and silk groups were 4.8, 14.8, and 16.4%, respectively, without significant differences among the groups. In colorectal surgery, the SSI rate in the Vicryl group was 13.9%, which was significantly lower than that of the silk group (22.4%; P = 0.034). The incidence of deeper SSIs in the Vicryl group, including deep incisional and organ/space SSIs, was significantly lower than that in the silk group (P = 0.04). The SSI rates did not differ among the suture types overall, in gastric surgery, or in appendectomy.

Conclusion: Using intra-abdominal absorbable sutures instead of silk sutures may reduce the risk of SSI, but only in colorectal surgery.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Child
  • Digestive System Surgical Procedures*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Polyglactin 910
  • Prospective Studies
  • Regression Analysis
  • Risk Factors
  • Silk
  • Surgical Wound Infection / epidemiology*
  • Sutures / adverse effects*

Substances

  • Silk
  • Polyglactin 910