Epinephrine plus argon plasma or heater probe coagulation in ulcer bleeding

World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep 28;17(36):4109-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i36.4109.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of argon plasma coagulation (APC) and heater probe coagulation (HPC) in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Methods: Eighty-five (18 female, 67 male) patients admitted for acute gastrointestinal bleeding due to gastric or duodenal ulcer were included in the study. Upper endoscopy was performed and HPC or APC were chosen randomly to stop the bleeding. Initial hemostasis and rebleeding rates were primary and secondary end-points of the study.

Results: Initial hemostasis was achieved in 97.7% (42/43) and 81% (36/42) of the APC and HPC groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Rebleeding rates were 2.4% (1/42) and 8.3% (3/36) in the APC and HPC groups, respectively, at 4 wk (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: APC is an effective hemostatic method in bleeding peptic ulcers. Larger multicenter trials are necessary to confirm these results.

Keywords: Argon plasma coagulation; Duodenal ulcer; Gastric ulcer; Heater probe coagulation; Upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Argon Plasma Coagulation*
  • Duodenal Ulcer / complications
  • Epinephrine / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Hemostasis, Endoscopic / methods*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage / therapy*
  • Stomach Ulcer / complications
  • Vasoconstrictor Agents / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Vasoconstrictor Agents
  • Epinephrine