Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):56.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.032. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to determine the effect of nonclosure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum during cesarean section on the formation of adhesions.

Study design: This was a prospective randomized trial of 533 women undergoing primary cesarean section; in 256 the peritoneum was left open and in 277 it was closed. Fifty women in the nonclosure group and 47 women in the closure group were subsequently evaluated intraoperatively at a repeat cesarean. The presence of adhesions and their severity were evaluated at several sites.

Results: The nonclosure and closure groups were comparable with regard to the proportion of patients with adhesions at any site (60% vs 51%, respectively; P = .31). Time from incision to delivery was comparable in the nonclosure and closure groups (8.98 ± 4.7 vs 9.32 ± 5.2 minutes, respectively; P = .84).

Conclusion: Closure or nonclosure of the peritoneum at cesarean section did not lead to large differences in the adhesion rate.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques / adverse effects*
  • Adult
  • Cesarean Section / methods*
  • Cesarean Section, Repeat / adverse effects
  • Cesarean Section, Repeat / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Peritoneum / surgery*
  • Pregnancy
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Tissue Adhesions / etiology*
  • Tissue Adhesions / prevention & control
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult