Background: Data on the risk stratification of patients undergoing mitral valve (MV) surgery for non-ischemic mitral disease are sparse. The present study seeks to define them in a contemporary cohort.
Methods: 193 consecutive patients referred to non-ischemic MV surgery were prospectively studied. Baseline characteristics and the type of surgery were analyzed with regard to operative and late mortality as well as functional outcome.
Results: 129 patients underwent MV replacement and 64 MV repair. MV replacement patients presented with more symptoms (p = 0.010), higher EuroSCORE (6.1 versus 5.6; p=0.009), more frequently underwent additional valve surgery (7.8 versus 0%; p = 0.003) and were more frequently female (p=0.048). Operative mortality was 3.1%, two thirds of operative deaths had additional surgery of the tricuspid valve (p = 0.019). Patients were followed for 5.2 ± 2.7 years. 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year survival rates were 93-, 91-, 82-, and 79% in MV replacement patients versus 100-, 98-, 96-, and 89% in patients with MV repair (p = 0.015). However, by multivariate logistic regression, overall mortality was determined by additional surgery of the tricuspid valve (p = 0.0103), multivessel coronary disease (p = 0.026), and age (p<0.0001), but not by the type of surgery (p=0.066). Furthermore, the type of surgery did not influence functional outcome (p = 0.515).
Conclusions: Apart from age and coronary artery disease the need for additional tricuspid valve surgery significantly determines the outcome of non-ischemic MV surgery. The type of operation appears less important when the need for additional valve surgery and co-morbidities like coronary artery disease are taken into consideration.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.