[Therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma with UFT--clinical evaluation of its effect in the combination therapy with transcatheter arterial embolization or one shot therapy]

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1990 Aug;17(8 Pt 1):1467-71.
[Article in Japanese]

Abstract

In 55 hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transcatheter arterial embolization or one shot therapy, the prognosis of patients treated with UFT (group A; n = 23) were historically compared with those of patients treated without UFT (group B; n=32). In group A, survival rate was 91.3% at 6 month; 67.5% at 1-year, 24.3% at 2-year, 24.3% at 3 year, in group B, 59.4% at 6-month, 37.5% at 1 year, 16.1% at 2-year. In these comparison, group A revealed significantly higher survival rate than group B. These results indicated that UFT was effective as maintenance therapy after transcatheter arterial embolization or one shot therapy with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / drug therapy
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / mortality
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / therapy*
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Drug Evaluation
  • Embolization, Therapeutic*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Intra-Arterial
  • Liver Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Liver Neoplasms / mortality
  • Liver Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prognosis
  • Survival Rate
  • Tegafur / administration & dosage
  • Uracil / administration & dosage

Substances

  • Tegafur
  • Uracil

Supplementary concepts

  • 1-UFT protocol