Irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic infections: does the organism matter?

J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6 Suppl):114-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.031. Epub 2011 May 31.

Abstract

Irrigation and debridement (I&D) is an attractive treatment alternative for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Irrigation and debridement failure rates average 64% (range, 10.5%-84%) and may be associated with causative organism type and virulence. The study objective was to compare revision rates for PJI caused by streptococcal organisms to other organisms treated with I&D. A multicenter retrospective cohort study of 200 consecutive PJIs treated with I&D was performed. Failure was defined as reoperation for PJI. Failure rate for streptococcal infections was 65% (20/31) compared with 71% (84/119) for other organisms. Failure rate for sensitive Staphylococcus was 72% (48/67) compared with a 76% (22/29) failure rate for resistant Staphylococcus. These results indicate that eradication rates of I&D for a streptococcal PJI are comparable with other causative organisms. Irrigation and debridement should play a limited role in the PJI treatment algorithm regardless of organism type.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Algorithms
  • Animals
  • Cohort Studies
  • Debridement / methods*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hip Prosthesis / microbiology*
  • Humans
  • Knee Prosthesis / microbiology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / therapy*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Staphylococcal Infections / therapy
  • Staphylococcus / isolation & purification*
  • Streptococcal Infections / therapy
  • Streptococcus / isolation & purification*
  • Therapeutic Irrigation / methods*
  • Treatment Failure
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult