Diffusion-weighted imaging in characterization of cystic pancreatic lesions

Clin Radiol. 2011 Sep;66(9):808-14. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 May 20.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can characterize or predict the malignant potential of cystic pancreatic lesions.

Materials and methods: Retrospective review of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) database over a 2-year period revealed 136 patients with cystic pancreatic lesions. Patients with DWI studies and histological confirmation of cystic mass were included. In patients with known pancreatitis, lesions with amylase content of >1000 IU/l that resolved on subsequent scans were included as pseudocysts. ADC of cystic lesions was measured by two independent reviewers. These values were then compared to categorize these lesions as benign or malignant using conventional MRI sequences.

Results: Seventy lesions were analysed: adenocarcinoma (n=4), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN; n=28), mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN; n=9), serous cystadenoma (n=16), and pseudocysts (n=13). There was no difference between ADC values of malignant and non-malignant lesions (p=0.06), between mucinous and serous tumours (p=0.12), or between IPMN and MCN (p=0.42). ADC values for low-grade IPMN were significantly higher than those for high-grade or invasive IPMN (p=0.03).

Conclusion: ADC values may be helpful in deciding the malignant potential of IPMN. However, they are not useful in differentiating malignant from benign lesions or for characterizing cystic pancreatic lesions.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Observer Variation
  • Pancreatic Cyst / diagnosis*
  • Pancreatic Cyst / pathology
  • Precancerous Conditions / diagnosis*
  • Precancerous Conditions / pathology
  • Reference Standards
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity