We have been attempting to develop a consistently reliable internal control to assure the effectiveness of the 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) fragile-X [fra(X)] induction system. We carried out a systematic study of whole-blood specimens cultured from 56 individuals from two different laboratories. An analysis of nearly 9,000 cells demonstrated: (1) the importance of establishing baseline levels of fragile sites in each laboratory, and (2) that a combination of common fragile sites (different for each laboratory) could serve as a consistently reliable indicator of the effectiveness of the FUdR fra(X) induction system. It was suggested that a non-FUdR culture(s) should be incorporated into a laboratory's fra(X)-screening protocol, so that if there are any doubts about the effectiveness of the FUdR system a comparison to background or spontaneously occurring fragile sites can be made within the laboratory. Repeat cultures are recommended where no increase in common fragile-site frequency is observed in the FUdR induction system, and where fra(X) was strongly suspected but not found. In addition, the necessity of using more than one fra(X) induction system in whole-blood cultures was demonstrated, including the effectiveness of an FUdR/excess thymidine double-induction system. Finally, 2 cases of apparent mosaicism for Klinefelter syndrome in fra(X) individuals were observed.