[Breast lesion diagnosis: integrating pathology and radiology]

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(18):A2967.
[Article in Dutch]

Abstract

Preoperative breast biopsies do not always provide a complete picture of a breast abnormality, especially in the subgroup of breast lesions classified as BI-RADS category 4 ('suspicious'). In such cases correlation with imaging results is mandatory. Sometimes ultrasound is the best modality, as demonstrated here in a 77-year-old patient with an intracystic papillary carcinoma with invasion. At other times mammography is preferred, as we demonstrate in a 50-year-old patient with screen-detected microcalcifications, initially diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ of the clinging type, later diagnosed as benign ductal hyperplasia. Finally, in a 45-year old patient with a palpable mass, caused by a grade III ductal carcinoma in situ, successful excision with tumour-free margins was achieved thanks to preoperative MRI.

Publication types

  • Case Reports
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Biopsy, Needle
  • Breast / pathology*
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Calcinosis / diagnosis
  • Carcinoma in Situ / diagnosis
  • Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast / diagnosis
  • Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating / diagnosis
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hyperplasia / diagnosis
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Mammography
  • Middle Aged
  • Preoperative Care
  • Ultrasonography, Mammary