Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography in a nationwide multicentre trial, and its relation to radiologist expertise

Gut. 2011 May;60(5):658-65. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.225623. Epub 2011 Jan 25.

Abstract

Objective: Reports on the accuracy of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) mainly involve series from expert institutions. The aims of this study were to assess CTC accuracy in a nationwide population and to relate it to radiologist performance in their initial training.

Design: Nationwide multicentre trial.

Setting: Twenty-eight radiologists, working in 26 mostly academic clinical units, were involved in the study after having attended a formal specialised 2-day training session on CTC. They worked through a training set of 52 cases with automatic feedback after an attempt at each case.

Patients: The study enrolled 845 patients with average and high risk of colorectal cancer, 737 of whom had both complete CTC and videocolonoscopy data, which constituted the dataset.

Interventions: Patients underwent same-day CTC followed by videocolonoscopy with segmental unblinding of CTC results.

Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for detection of polyps ≥ 6 mm in per-patient and per-lesion analyses of CTC without computer-aided detection.

Results: Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for patients with polyps ≥ 6 mm were 69% (95% CI 61% to 77%), 91% (95% CI 89% to 94%), 67% (95% CI 59% to 74%) and 92% (95% CI 90% to 94%), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the detection rate for polyps ≥ 6 mm was linked to neither radiologist case volume nor number of polyps, but was related to sensitivity achieved in the training set. Pooled sensitivity was 72% (95% CI 63% to 80%) versus 51% (95% CI 40% to 60%) for radiologists achieving above and below median sensitivity in the training set (61%), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that sensitivity for polyps ≥ 6 mm in the training set was the only remaining significant predictive factor for subsequent performance.

Conclusions: Radiologist sensitivity CTC for detection of polyps ≥ 6 mm in training was the sole independent predictor for subsequent sensitivity in detection of such polyps.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Clinical Competence*
  • Colonic Polyps / diagnosis
  • Colonic Polyps / diagnostic imaging
  • Colonic Polyps / pathology
  • Colonography, Computed Tomographic / methods
  • Colonography, Computed Tomographic / standards*
  • Colonoscopy
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Education, Medical, Continuing / methods
  • Epidemiologic Methods
  • Female
  • France
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Occult Blood
  • Radiology / education
  • Radiology / standards*
  • Video Recording