[Renal LESS surgery: Slight modification or surgical revolution?]

Prog Urol. 2011 Jan;21(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2010.08.008.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Objective: to present our initial experience of laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) renal surgery.

Methods: between May 2009 and March 2010, nine nephrectomies and one cyst decortication were performed in nine patients. Eight of the procedures were done with three 5mm trocars inserted through a unique peri-umbilical incision. In two cases, a specific single-port device was used. All operations were achieved with a 5-mm 30° lens and conventional laparoscopic instruments. The specimens were entrapped in a 10mm endoscopic bag and extracted through the umbilical incision.

Results: mean age was 56 years old. Mean BMI was 23.5 [19-34]. Mean operative time was 149min [80-240], and estimated blood loss was 90ml [20-250]. None of the patients required blood transfusion. Mean length of stay was 4.1 days [3-5]. Only one major complication occurred (functional occlusion). One conversion to conventional laparoscopy was necessary in a case of inflammatory kidney. Histologic exam showed benign lesions (cyst and non functional kidney) in seven cases, and papillary carcinoma in three cases.

Conclusion: LESS surgery is feasible. Its advantages over conventional laparoscopy are not clear. LESS is a new procedure that should benefit from the improvement of technical instrumentation.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kidney Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Laparoscopy* / instrumentation
  • Laparoscopy* / methods
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nephrectomy* / instrumentation
  • Nephrectomy* / methods
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Umbilicus*
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures