The accuracy and reliability of preoperative templating for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing

J Arthroplasty. 2011 Aug;26(5):765-70. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.024. Epub 2010 Sep 25.

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of preoperative templating on conventional radiographs (CRs) for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and to determine the factors affecting the accuracy. Four observers templated 80 CRs on 2 separate occasions in a blinded fashion. Eight independent variables were evaluated to investigate their effect on the accuracy of templating. The overall accuracy of templating within one size of the actual component was 80.6% for the femoral component and 98.5% for the acetabular component. Overall, the intraobserver and interobserver reliability was fair to substantial (κ = 0.22-0.61). Using multiple regression analysis, surgical time was the only factor that affected the accuracy of predicting the size of the acetabular component (P = .019). We conclude that CR templating for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is a useful method for preoperative planning of the sizes of the respective implants and that surgeon experience does play a significant role in the accuracy of predicting component size during templating.

MeSH terms

  • Acetabulum / diagnostic imaging
  • Acetabulum / surgery
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods*
  • Female
  • Femur / diagnostic imaging
  • Femur / surgery
  • Hip Joint / diagnostic imaging
  • Hip Joint / surgery*
  • Hip Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Metals*
  • Middle Aged
  • Observer Variation
  • Osteoarthritis, Hip / surgery*
  • Preoperative Period
  • Prosthesis Design / methods*
  • Prosthesis Fitting / methods*
  • Radiography
  • Regression Analysis
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Metals