Adverse reactions to complementary medicines: the Australian pharmacy experience

Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Aug;18(4):242-4. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2010.00036.x.

Abstract

Objectives: The primary aim was to determine the prevalence of adverse reactions to over-the-counter complementary medicines and their severity, as described by consumers. Secondary aims were to identify consumers' reporting behaviours and understanding of the AUST L designation on product labels.

Methods: An anonymous, self-administered survey was completed by randomly selected pharmacy customers at 60 community pharmacy locations between August 2008 and February 2009.

Key findings: Of the 1121 survey participants (response rate 62%), 72% had used a complementary medicine product in the previous 12 months, and 7% of this group (n = 55) reported having experienced an adverse reaction at some time. Of these, 71% described the reaction as mild and not requiring treatment, 22% as moderate and/or requiring advice from a healthcare professional and 7% (n = 4) described it as severe and requiring hospitalisation. If they were to report the reaction, it was most commonly to a medical practitioner. Most (88%) of complementary medicine consumers had never noticed the term 'AUST L'.

Conclusions: Complementary medicines are widely used by pharmacy customers. Adverse reactions to these products are under-reported to healthcare authorities. Most adverse reactions are mild and serious reactions are rare. Customers have little awareness of the designation AUST L.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems*
  • Australia
  • Community Pharmacy Services
  • Complementary Therapies / adverse effects*
  • Drug Labeling
  • Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Prevalence
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Surveys and Questionnaires