Cost-effectiveness of a participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: design of a randomised controlled trial

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Mar 28:11:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-60.

Abstract

Background: Within the working population there is a vulnerable group: workers without an employment contract and workers with a flexible labour market arrangement, e.g. temporary agency workers. In most cases, when sick-listed, these workers have no workplace/employer to return to. Also, for these workers access to occupational health care is limited or even absent in many countries. For this vulnerable working population there is a need for tailor-made occupational health care, including the presence of an actual return-to-work perspective. Therefore, a participatory return-to-work program has been developed based on a successful return-to-work intervention for workers, sick-listed due to low back pain.The objective of this paper is to describe the design of a randomised controlled trial to study the (cost-)effectiveness of this newly developed participatory return-to-work program adapted for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers, sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders, compared to usual care.

Methods/design: The design of this study is a randomised controlled trial with one year of follow-up. The study population consists of temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed between 2 and 8 weeks due to musculoskeletal disorders. The new return-to-work program is a stepwise program aimed at making a consensus-based return-to-work implementation plan with the possibility of a (therapeutic) workplace to return-to-work. Outcomes are measured at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The primary outcome measure is duration of the sickness benefit period after the first day of reporting sick. Secondary outcome measures are: time until first return-to-work, total number of days of sickness benefit during follow-up; functional status; intensity of musculoskeletal pain; pain coping; and attitude, social influence and self-efficacy determinants. Cost-benefit is evaluated from an insurer's perspective. A process evaluation is part of this study.

Discussion: For sick-listed workers without an employment contract there can be gained a lot by improving occupational health care, including return-to-work guidance, and by minimising the 'labour market handicap' by creating a return-to-work perspective. In addition, reduction of sickness absence and work disability, i.e. a reduction of disability claims, may result in substantial benefits for the Dutch Social Security System.

Trial registration number: NTR1047.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / methods*
  • Cost of Illness
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis / methods*
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Disabled Persons / rehabilitation
  • Health Care Costs
  • Health Services Needs and Demand / economics
  • Humans
  • Insurance, Disability
  • Middle Aged
  • Musculoskeletal Diseases / economics
  • Musculoskeletal Diseases / rehabilitation*
  • National Health Programs / standards
  • National Health Programs / trends
  • Netherlands
  • Occupational Diseases / economics
  • Occupational Health Services / economics
  • Occupational Health Services / methods*
  • Occupational Health Services / trends
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care / economics
  • Program Development / economics
  • Program Evaluation / economics
  • Rehabilitation, Vocational / economics
  • Rehabilitation, Vocational / methods*
  • Self Efficacy
  • Sick Leave / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Sick Leave / statistics & numerical data
  • Sick Leave / trends
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Unemployment / statistics & numerical data
  • Unemployment / trends
  • Work Capacity Evaluation
  • Workload / economics
  • Young Adult