Midterm results of valve repair with a biodegradable annuloplasty ring for acute endocarditis

Abstract

Background: Conventional annuloplasty rings consist of woven, nondegradable prosthetic material. Their use should theoretically be limited in acute infective endocarditis. Novel biodegradable annuloplasty rings, which are implanted into the annulus, carry theoretical advantages, but have never been evaluated for feasibility and mid-term outcome in such patients.

Methods: Between 2004 and 2009, 17 consecutive patients with acute infective endocarditis (age, 34.5+/-21.6 years; range, 11-82 years; 8 men) had mitral (n=13), tricuspid (n=3), and mitral and tricuspid (n=1) annuloplasty to conclude valve repair. Repair was performed by complete excision of the infected tissue, valvar reconstruction, and biodegradable ring annuloplasty. Prospectively collected clinical and echocardiographic data were analyzed retrospectively.

Results: Indications for surgery were heart failure (n=9; 52.9%), hemodynamic instability (n=8; 47%), and persistent infection or sepsis despite antibiotics (n=6; 35.3%). Staphylococci (n=7) and Streptococci (n=4) were the most common causes. Three patients died on postoperative days 1, 2, and 34 because of massive gastrointestinal bleeding; heart failure and pneumonia; and sepsis and acute renal failure, respectively. During a median follow-up of survivors at 29.6 months (range, 2.0 to 51.0 months), no mortality, recurrence, or reoperation occurred. At follow-up, transthoracic echocardiography revealed no or trivial regurgitation in 11 and mild in 3 patients. Left ventricular dimensions regressed significantly after mitral repair.

Conclusions: Valve repair using a biodegradable ring showed good structural and functional properties up to 4 years after repair. Implantation of the biodegradable ring is feasible and effective in patients with acute infective endocarditis. Its intraannular implantation, hindering direct blood contact and associated risk of colonization, represents a theoretical advantage in such patients. Larger comparative studies are needed for further conclusions.