Evaluation of pericardial sinuses and recesses with 2-, 4-, 16-, and 64-row multidetector CT

Radiol Med. 2010 Oct;115(7):1038-46. doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0532-1. Epub 2010 Feb 22.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe visualisation rate and appearance of all pericardial sinuses and recesses and to evaluate whether there is a significant difference between visualisation of these sinuses and recesses on 2-, 4-, 16- and 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed 588 MDCT scans of the chest obtained with a protocol for pulmonary embolism.

Results: The visualisation rate of any pericardial recess was 85.2%. The rates on 2-, 4-, 16- and 64-slice MDCT were 74.7%, 90.6%, 90.3% and 88.7%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in visualisation rates of pericardial recesses between 2-slice MDCT and other MDCT systems (p<0.01). Age, and 4-, 16- and 64-slice MDCT versus 2-slice MDCT and the presence of pleural effusion appeared as significant predictors of the presence of any recess.

Conclusions: Visualisation rates of pericardial recesses are higher with 4-, 16- and 64-slice MDCT than with 2-slice MDCT. Therefore, radiologists need to be familiar with the different appearances of pericardial recesses on MDCT to avoid misdiagnosis.

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Pericardium / diagnostic imaging*
  • Radiography, Thoracic
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*