Long-term outcomes of surgical approaches to the treatment of floppy eyelid syndrome

Abstract

Objective: To identify and describe the different procedures used in the treatment of floppy eyelid syndrome (FES) at Moorfields Eye Hospital and to evaluate their effectiveness.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Participants: A total of 71 patients who had undergone surgery for FES over a 13-year period since 1995 at Moorfields Eye Hospital were recruited. Retrospective data from 7 patients were also included, providing data for 78 patients.

Methods: Patients underwent a full ocular examination. A survival analysis was determined by plotting Kaplan-Meier curves for each type of procedure encountered. Comparison of survival trends was made using a log-rank test. The possible effects of bias arising from bilaterality of the condition were investigated using a sensitivity analysis and a Cox regression analysis allowing for clusters. Tests for surgeon bias were made using the Fisher exact test.

Main outcome measures: Recurrence of the condition. An assessment of recurrence was made clinically by 2 independent observers who were masked to the type of surgery the patient had undergone.

Results: Four different forms of surgical treatment were encountered: (1) Full-thickness wedge excision (FTWE) (26 patients, 33 procedures); (2) Upper lid lateral tarsal strip (LTS) (31 patients, 43 procedures); (3) Medial canthal (MC) and lateral canthal (LC) plication (15 patients, 19 procedures); (4) Medial tarsal strip (6 patients, 6 procedures). A total of 44 of 101 procedures had failed. Superior long-term survival outcomes of both LC/MC plication (P = 0.003) and upper lid LTS (P = 0.001) procedures over FTWE was demonstrated. However, survival comparison between the LC/MC plication and LTS groups did not achieve significance (P = 0.37). No significant difference in outcome between surgeon groups of equivalent experience was demonstrated (P = 0.18). No bias arising from bilaterality of the condition was identified.

Conclusions: These data provide strong evidence of better survival outcomes in FES using the MC/LC plication and LTS procedures in comparison with the FTWE procedure. On the basis of experience from our unit, we recommend that the FTWE procedure be avoided as a form of treatment for FES in favor of the MC/LC plication, LTS, or medial tarsal strip procedure.

Financial disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.