[Cytology of the urinary tract: Between uncertainty and clarity]

Pathologe. 2009 Dec:30 Suppl 2:173-8. doi: 10.1007/s00292-009-1190-8.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Reliable detection of poorly differentiated urothelial carcinoma and the detection of carcinoma in situ, which is often invisible by cystoscopy, are the undisputed strength of urinary cytology. In contrast, well-differentiated urothelial tumors are often missed by cytology. We suggest the following classification: negative, questionable, suspicious, and positive. Due to the complex clinico-pathological associations, the classification should always be accompanied by an appropriate commentary. The WHO 2004 classification separates the clinically less important low-grade tumors from the clinically relevant high-grade tumors, usually classified as "positive" by cytology. A cytological diagnosis of low-grade tumors by cytology is of minor clinical importance. Most urothelial neoplasias are characterized by chromosomal aberrations. This makes multi-target fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay suitable for the clarification of non-definitive cytology. In contrast, positive cytology does not need further confirmation by FISH analysis. Standardized diagnosis and the possibility for supplementary analyses increase the diagnostic value of urinary cytology.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Carcinoma in Situ / genetics
  • Carcinoma in Situ / pathology*
  • Carcinoma, Transitional Cell / genetics
  • Carcinoma, Transitional Cell / pathology*
  • Chromosome Aberrations
  • Cystoscopy
  • Humans
  • In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness / pathology
  • Urinary Bladder / pathology
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / genetics
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Urine / cytology