Assessing the feasibility of a one-stop approach to diagnosis for urological patients

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 May;91(4):305-9. doi: 10.1308/003588409X391802. Epub 2009 Apr 2.

Abstract

Introduction: Conventional publicly funded out-patient services in many specialties are characterised by delays, fragmented diagnostic processes, and overloaded clinics. This is bad for patients as it is clinically dangerous; bad for managers who spend hours managing the failure; bad for doctors who respond by overloading clinics; and bad for purchasers who have to fund the multiple out-patient visits needed. Sound clinical and financial reasons exist for introducing more efficient diagnostic processes.

Patients and methods: A total of 330 consecutive patients referred to the urology department of Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust were invited to attend one of nine one-stop clinics staffed by consultant urologists with specialist registrars, nurses, and clerical staff. Pre-clinic blood and urine tests were ordered based on the referral letter. Clinics had facilities to perform cystoscopy, ultrasound, and urinary flow studies. Correspondence was generated in real time, and a copy given to the patient.

Results: Overall, 257 patients attended the clinics. Twenty-three patients cancelled appointments and 50 patients did not attend. Pre-clinic tests were requested in 133 patients and were completed by 86% of the patients who attended. Of patients, 42% were diagnosed and discharged; 28% were listed for surgery, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), or referred to another specialty. About 30% of patients needed further out-patient review; in approximately two-thirds to complete a diagnosis and one-third to review the results of therapy initiated. An estimated 350 appointments and 550 patient visits to hospital were saved.

Conclusions: A one-stop method of consultation is efficient across a range of urological presenting complaints, and dramatically reduces the need for follow-up consultations. It has potential to: (i) reduce delays to being seen in out-patients; (ii) lead to more cost-effective care; and (iii) increase safety and patient satisfaction. It should become the standard of care in urology, and is probably applicable in many other disciplines.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Ambulatory Care / organization & administration*
  • Ambulatory Care / standards
  • Ambulatory Care / statistics & numerical data
  • Appointments and Schedules
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Humans
  • London
  • Outpatient Clinics, Hospital / organization & administration*
  • Outpatient Clinics, Hospital / standards
  • Outpatient Clinics, Hospital / statistics & numerical data
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Urologic Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Urology Department, Hospital / organization & administration*
  • Urology Department, Hospital / standards
  • Urology Department, Hospital / statistics & numerical data