Restorative proctocolectomy. Does ethnicity affect outcome?

Colorectal Dis. 2009 Nov;11(9):972-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01727.x. Epub 2008 Oct 25.

Abstract

Objective: Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is well-established in the management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). We review outcome of pouch surgery from a single centre, comparing non-South Asian and South Asian Caucasian populations.

Method: Patients undergoing RPC for UC and FAP during a 10-year period between January 1997 and January 2007 were identified from hospital records. Data were collected retrospectively from case notes on early and long-term results.

Results: A total of 107 patients underwent pouch formation for UC (94%) or FAP (6%) and 22 (21%) were from the Asian subcontinent. Eighty-seven (81%) underwent a three-stage procedure and 20 (19%) a two-stage procedure. Postoperative complications occurred in 40 (37%) patients, being major in 11 (10%) patients with relaparotomy required in 9 (8%) with no difference between South Asian and non-South Asian Caucasian patients. Long-term pouch function, with a median of five times over 24 h (range 2-15), was similar between the two groups. The incidence of pouchitis was 57 (53%) and this was significantly greater in the South Asian population [17/21 (77%); 39/86 (46%); P = 0.006].

Conclusion: Surgical results were similar in South Asian and non-South Asian Caucasian patients, but the incidence of pouchitis was greater in the former group.

MeSH terms

  • Adenomatous Polyposis Coli / ethnology
  • Adenomatous Polyposis Coli / surgery*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Asian People
  • Colonic Pouches / adverse effects*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pouchitis / ethnology*
  • Pouchitis / etiology*
  • Proctocolectomy, Restorative / adverse effects*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • White People
  • Young Adult