Objective: To compare the efficacy of conservative or pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) therapy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients according to a new clinical classification scheme.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 63 cases of CTEPH admitted to our hospital from February 1995 to October 2007 and 45 cases were treated surgically (Group A) and 18 cases received conservative therapy (Group B). Results were analyzed using Fisher exact test and t test according to San Diego medical center quartering classification scheme and Anzhen Hospital modified bifurcate classification scheme.
Results: There were 6 operational deaths in Group A and 2 deaths during hospital stay in Group B. During follow-ups (mean 3.6 +/- 2.5 years), there were 4 deaths in Group A and 9 deaths in Group B. the totality survival rate is significantly higher in Group A than that in Group B (P < 0.05). For patients with San Diego Type I CTEPH, survival rate was significantly higher in Group A compared with Group B (P = 0.009) and was similar for patients with type II and III and IV CTEPH between the two groups (P = 0.338, 0.455, 0.800). Survival rate was significantly higher in Group A than that in Group B for patients with Anzhen central type CTEPH (P = 0.009), but was similar between the two groups for patients with Anzhen peripheral type CTEPH (P = 0.125). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve 5 years survival rate in the Group A was (91.7 +/- 8.0)% for Anzhen central type and (76.0 +/- 8.5)% for Anzhen peripheral type (P = 0.04), and the 5 years Kaplan-Meier survival rate in the Group B was (42.9 +/- 18.7)% for Anzhen central type and (56.2 +/- 10.8)% for Anzhen peripheral type (P = 0.851).
Conclusion: Anzhen Hospital modified bifurcate classification scheme is a simple and effective classification to predict the prognosis and choose treatment method of CTEPH.