Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for patients with acute liver failure (ALF) is still controversial. To be considered a feasible alternative, this therapeutic option should offer similar results to transplants performed with cadaveric grafts, without significant risks for donors. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of pediatric patients with ALF who were transplanted with either cadaveric or living donor grafts.
Patients and methods: Between March 1994 and February 2007, 149 patients under 18 years were transplanted, including 43 (28.8%) with ALF. We reviewed the demography, etiology, surgical technique, complications, and long-term results in this group. Patient actuarial survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Results: The median age of the recipients was 4.8 years (range 1.2 to 18) including 26 boys and 17 girls. Sixteen (37.2%) underwent LDLT. Three patients in the living donor group needed a second graft (18.7%) versus 7 (26%) among the cadaveric group. No mortality or serious morbidity was observed in living donors. Fifteen patients died. Septic and neurologic complications, and primary graft non-function were the most frequent causes of death. All patients died during the first year after liver transplant. Actuarial 1- and 5-year survivals were 65% without a significant difference between the groups.
Conclusion: Considering that patients with ALF have no chance of survival without transplantation and that cadaveric grafts remain a limited resource, especially in our country, these results showed that LDLT was a valid option for these patients, as well as a secure procedure for the donors.