A colorectal surgeons viewpoint on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery

Minerva Chir. 2008 Oct;63(5):385-8.

Abstract

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) represents a burgeoning but still largely experimental field. Most NOTES researchers have favored transgastric and transvaginal approaches to abdominal access. For surgeries involving the upper abdominal organs, transvaginal and transanal approach promise to provide a more direct route in contrast to the often cumbersome retroflexion typically required with the transgastric approach. The potential disadvantages of the transanal route are also significant and include issues of sterility, the risk of inadvertent trauma to adjacent organs during transmural puncture, and the risk of colonic wall shearing. This article reviews early development of NOTES, the evolution of transanal access to the peritoneal cavity, highlights the various techniques that have been used for transanal access, and discusses the relative advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Colectomy
  • Colorectal Surgery / methods*
  • Endoscopes*
  • Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal / trends*
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy
  • Peritoneal Cavity / surgery
  • Rectal Neoplasms / surgery
  • Risk Factors